![]() |
|
"During an earthquake the angle iron would put the floor framing into a condition known as 'cross grain
Wood has very little strength to resist cross grain bending, so little, in fact, that the building code does not even publish strength values for wood stressed in this manner. In addition to probable damage to the wood, the steel angle will act as a lever to break apart the concrete. While there are cases that angle-irons could be effective, in the majority of houses it is impossible to use them cost efficiently." |
|
Example 3 - This photo shows two metal straps connecting the beam, post, and concrete "This installation is ineffective for several reasons: First, the 'T' strap is not installed in such a way that it can resist earthquake forces acting from side to side—the post will act as a lever and bend the strap. Second, if the straps are intended to keep the support post and beam from lifting up, the concrete pier that the lower strap connects to is not heavy enough offer much anchorage (uplift is not a serious concern anyway, because during earthquakes houses mostly sway from side to side rather than jumping up and down). Third, the slant in the bottom strap would tend to pull the post sideways if the post did actually try to lift up." |
|
Example 4 - Each of these three straps is connected with a single bolt to the foundation. "These straps are meant to join two pieces of wood together end-to-end. As they are installed here, they can only resist forces acting upward. When an earthquake moves the floor from side to side, the straps will simply pivot around the bolts in the concrete." |
|
Example 5 - "The manufacturer of these 'twist straps' does not intend for them to resist side-to-side forces generated by earthquakes. As they are installed here, they can only resist the floor trying to lift up off of the foundation. Side-to-side movement is the major cause of damage to buildings during earthquakes, and this installation is essentially worthless in preventing such damage." |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Example 7 - This installation is also made of two straps and is similar to Example 3, only the "T" strap is turned sideways because a block obstructed its installation. "This installation is worse than the previous one for two reasons: The "T" strap is wrinkled, which will allow it to kink or bend more easily. Also, the manufacturer gives no load rating for the sideways installation." |
||||||||||
|
"There appear to be about five or six nails in each space between studs. Assuming that there is one nail into each stud, then this shear wall only has about one-sixth of its intended strength." |
||||||||||
|
Example 9 - The "mudsill" is the wood member that bolts to the concrete foundation and supports almost all the weight of the house. Plywood shear walls must connect to the mudsill. The "Nailed Blocking Method" is used almost exclusively throughout the Bay Area. This is an untested method, and no one knows how well it will work. Other methods of making this connection are much more effective. Below is an illustration of how the Nailed Blocking Method is constructed. |
||||||||||
|
Plywood is then nailed into the blocks and this attaches the plywood to the mudsill. |
||||||||||
|
Example 10 - The plywood on the other side of this wall is nailed to the short block.
Short blocks tend to split very easily—when this happens, the strength of a block is severely compromised. Plywood on many retrofit shear walls "Not only do the nails that connect the block to the mudsill tend to split the blocks, but the nails driven from the plywood into the blocks will also tend to split them. In most cases, once the sheet of plywood is nailed up, the blocks are completely concealed, and it is impossible to know if they have split." |
||||||||||
|
"Using the correct quantity and size of nails is essential in providing the strength needed to resist seismic forces. The nails in this block are also installed so close to the ends that they will likely split out the ends of the block during an earthquake." |
||||||||||
|
"Shear walls must have rows of nails along each edge of plywood. This installation will have only a small fraction of the strength of a properly constructed shear wall."
|
|
"The manufacturer intends for these straps to be installed straight, not bent as these were. With the bend in these straps they would not even resist uplift forces until the house had lifted up about two inches and the slack due to the bend in the strap was taken up." |
||
|
"As installed, this hardware does not have any capacity to resist side-to-side movement, which is what causes most earthquake damage. Additionally, the installation has almost no strength to resist uplift, because the bolt connecting it to the concrete footing is so close to the top of the footing that it could easily break out of the concrete." |
||
|
"Since those early recommendations, several manufacturers have developed many connectors specifically intended to resist earthquake forces. Thankfully we now have much more to choose from than plumber's tape. Even 30 years ago, a plywood shear wall could have been built here as a much more effective installation." |
||
|
"The manufacturer of this clip rates it as resisting 455 pounds of uplift, but only 125 pounds side-to-side force. And those ratings are only valid if proper connectors (nails) are used, and if all the connectors are installed. A different connector would be much more cost-efficient and better for resisting earthquake forces." |
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Example 18 - When the mudsill slides on the foundation, as in an earthquake, the metal plate would spin around the single bolt at the bottom of the plate like a propeller. This rotation will cause the bolts to push up and break the mudsill. |
|
It is hoped that these examples of poor retrofit work impress upon you the need to check the work (that means YOU should crawl under your house) after a contractor has finished your retrofit but BEFORE you pay him. |
|
|
|